What the aid cuts will show
Foreign aid, humanitarian aid and aid effectiveness appear on 69 recent papers, mostly in the economics journals, with no rise despite the largest aid cuts in decades in 2025. The cuts are a natural experiment that the earlier aid-effectiveness debate never had. Which programmes' loss shows up first in health, schooling and conflict?
What prompted this
Since October 2025, 69 papers carry a foreign-aid, development-aid, humanitarian-aid, aid-effectiveness or donor keyword (45 in economics journals): "foreign aid" on 16, "humanitarian aid" on 12, "development aid" on 6, "aid effectiveness" on 6, "aid allocation" on 5. The quarter to September 2026 had 16 such papers, in line with earlier quarters.
Questions
- In districts where health programmes lost funding in 2025, did child mortality and disease incidence rise within a year, and did governments or other donors replace the money?
- Did cash-based humanitarian aid, cut in several crises, show larger effects than in-kind aid when it stopped?
- Do the cuts change where people migrate from?
Data that could help
Project-level aid data with locations (AidData, the OECD creditor reporting system), health surveillance and survey data, and conflict and migration records.
Next step
Map the 2025 programme terminations to districts and compare health indicators in those districts with neighbouring ones that kept funding.