Remittances when payments become instant
Remittances appear on 50 recent papers, mostly in economics, but only 12 of them carry a cost, fee, digital, mobile, fintech or stablecoin keyword. Instant payment systems, mobile money links and stablecoins are cutting the cost of sending money home. Does cheaper sending raise the amount received, and who switches?
What prompted this
Since October 2025, 50 papers carry a remittance keyword (33 in economics journals, 10 in finance), with "remittances" on 39 and "international remittances" on 5. Only 12 of the 50 also carry a cost, fee, instant-payment, digital, mobile, fintech, crypto or stablecoin keyword. The global average cost of sending remittances has fallen but remains above the 3% target.
Questions
- When a corridor gets a cheaper channel (a mobile money link or a stablecoin route), do remittances rise by more than the fee saved, and does the money shift from informal channels?
- Who uses the new channels: younger migrants, those with bank accounts, those sending small amounts?
- Do recipients spend remittances differently when they arrive in digital wallets rather than cash?
Data that could help
Remittance prices by corridor (the World Bank's Remittance Prices Worldwide), central bank remittance statistics, mobile money operator data and household surveys in recipient countries.
Next step
Match corridor-level price changes since 2019 to remittance flows and test whether flows respond more where digital channels entered.