Short selling in China's A-share market after the restrictions
Short selling and short-selling constraints appear on 56 recent papers, but only 10 of them carry a China keyword, although China restricted securities lending repeatedly in 2023 and 2024 to support prices. What did the restrictions do to price efficiency, liquidity and the overvaluation of hard-to-short stocks?
What prompted this#
Since October 2025, 56 papers carry a short-selling, securities-lending or margin-trading keyword (47 in finance journals): "short-selling constraints" on 23, "short selling" on 21, "short-selling ban" on 5, "securities lending" on 5, "margin trading" on 4. Only 10 also carry a China or Chinese-market keyword, although China's securities lending rules changed several times in 2023 and 2024.
Questions#
- After securities lending was restricted, did stocks that had been heavily shorted become more overvalued relative to fundamentals, and did their prices react more slowly to bad news?
- Did the restrictions reduce volatility in falling markets, as intended, or only move bearish trading to index futures and options?
- Did quantitative funds that relied on short positions shrink or move to other markets?
Data that could help#
Daily securities lending and margin balances by stock, the dates of rule changes, stock prices, earnings announcements and futures positions (CSMAR, Wind).
Next step#
Compare post-earnings drift and price reactions to bad news in stocks with high and low pre-restriction short interest, before and after each rule change.