The compute bill of AI papers
Inference latency and resource-constrained deployment are among the fastest-growing keywords in the AI journals, yet only 15 of 226 such papers carry an energy, carbon or green-AI keyword. How much computing do the methods in AI journals cost to train and run, and would reporting it change which methods win?
What prompted this
In the AI journals, "inference latency" had 12 papers in July–September 2026 against about 5 expected and "resource-constrained deployment" 10 against 4 (see the AI dashboard). Since October 2025, 226 papers carry an inference-latency, resource-constrained or edge-deployment keyword (199 in AI journals). Only 15 of them carry an energy, carbon, green-AI or power-consumption keyword, and "green AI" itself appears on 6.
Questions
- What share of recent AI-journal papers report training compute, inference time or energy, and do they report them for the baselines too?
- If results were compared per unit of computing, how often would the winner change?
- Would a short reporting checklist (hardware, hours, energy) be adopted, as code release was?
Possible approach
Code a sample of recent papers for what they report about computing, and re-rank the reported results by accuracy per GPU-hour where both are given.
Next step
Code 100 recent papers from the AI journals for whether they report hardware, training time, inference time and energy use.