Virtual influencers and the disclosure of nobody
Virtual influencers, avatars and virtual humans appear on 33 recent papers in the management and AI journals, with 9 in the last quarter against about 7 per quarter before. Brands now run computer-generated personalities with millions of followers. Do they sell, do followers care that no one is there, and what should disclosure rules require?
What prompted this
Since October 2025, 33 papers carry a virtual-influencer, virtual-human, digital-human, avatar or virtual-idol keyword (17 in management journals, 11 in AI): "virtual influencers" on 12, "avatars" on 5, "virtual humans" on 4, "virtual idols" on 2. The quarter to September 2026 had 9 such papers against about 7 per quarter earlier.
Questions
- In matched campaigns, do virtual influencers deliver the same engagement and sales as human influencers at lower cost and risk?
- Does disclosure that an influencer is synthetic reduce trust, and does the effect fade as audiences get used to them?
- Who is responsible when a virtual influencer makes a false claim or endorses a product that harms someone?
Data that could help
Campaign performance data from brands and agencies, follower surveys, and platform disclosure policies.
Next step
Compare engagement and conversion for matched product promotions by virtual and human influencers on one platform, with and without synthetic-disclosure labels.