Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for: papers linking to it

OSF · Text · 2017 · osf.io/97upg/

← Code and data repositories cited in research papers

Research papers in the 480 tracked journals that link to Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for (https://osf.io/97upg/), read from their Crossref records: by year, category and journal, the family tree of papers building on one another, and the linked repositories derived from it or that it derives from.

Key findings#

4 papers in the tracked journals link to the OSF dataset Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for in their Crossref records, the first in 2021; most of them (2) in 2024.
By category: Information Systems (3) and AI (1); the journals with the most are Ethics and Information Technology (2), AI & Society (1) and Information Systems Frontiers (1).

By year#

20212024

Papers linking to Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for by publication year
Year	Papers
2021	1
2022	1
2024	2

Journals#

Journals whose papers link to Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for most
Journal	Papers
Ethics and Information Technology	2
AI & Society	1
Information Systems Frontiers	1

Papers linking to Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for, most cited first
Published	Title	Journal	Authors	Citations	Link
2021-08-31	Operationalising AI ethics: how are companies bridging the gap between practice and principles? An exploratory study	AI & Society	Javier Camacho Ibáñez, Mónica Villas Olmeda	85	cites it
2022-06-28	From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence	Information Systems Frontiers	Vasiliki Koniakou	60	cites it
2024-11-15	Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement	Ethics and Information Technology	Marie Christin Decker, Laila Wegner, Carmen Leicht-Scholten	47	cites it
2024-08-12	Human digital twins unlocking Society 5.0? Approaches, emerging risks and disruptions	Ethics and Information Technology	Catarina Fontes, Dino Carpentras, Sachit Mahajan	35	cites it

How this is measured#

Links are read from each paper's Crossref record as its publisher deposited it: the URLs and repository DOIs in its reference list (the software and data it cites) and its supplementary links (“is-supplemented-by”: its own code or data). A paper that gives its code only in the text, a footnote or a data availability statement is not counted, and some publishers deposit reference lists without their URLs, so every count here is a lower bound. Repository details come from the GitHub REST API (stars, forks, and the repository a fork was made from), the Hugging Face Hub API (likes, downloads, and the base model a model was derived from) and DataCite (Zenodo and other data DOIs, and the GitHub release a Zenodo record archives), read again every month.

Cite this page

Scholar4AI. (2026). Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for: papers linking to it. Journal and Conference Research Rankings. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://scholar4ai.com/code/osf-97upg

@misc{scholar4ai-code-osf-97upg,
  author = {{Scholar4AI}},
  title = {Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for: papers linking to it},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://scholar4ai.com/code/osf-97upg}},
  urldate = {2026-11-03},
  note = {Journal and Conference Research Rankings; data from OpenAlex (CC0); licensed CC BY-NC 4.0}
}

Free to reuse for non-commercial purposes with attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0).