Scholar4AI Updated 2026-11-03 14:43 UTC+09:00

tm (R package): papers linking to it

CRAN · CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm

← Code and data repositories cited in research papers

Research papers in the 480 tracked journals that link to tm (R package) (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm), read from their Crossref records: by year, category and journal, the family tree of papers building on one another, and the linked repositories derived from it or that it derives from.

Share: X LinkedIn Bluesky Threads Facebook Reddit Hacker News Hatena LINE Email
Copy:

Key findings#

  • 24 papers in the tracked journals link to tm (R package) in their Crossref records, the first in 2017; most of them (4) in 2022.
  • By category: Higher Education and Research (6), Management (5) and Statistics (4); the journals with the most are Scientometrics (5), Information Systems Frontiers (2) and Statistical Papers (2).
  • 2 of the papers build on one another: a later paper cites an earlier one that also links tm (R package).

By year#

2017: 3 papers2018: 3 papers2019: 2 papers2020: 1 paper2021: 4 papers2022: 4 papers2023: 3 papers2024: 1 paper2025: 1 paper2026: 2 papers
20172026
Papers linking to tm (R package) by publication year
YearPapers
20173
20183
20192
20201
20214
20224
20233
20241
20251
20262

Journals#

Journals whose papers link to tm (R package) most
JournalPapers
Scientometrics5
Information Systems Frontiers2
Statistical Papers2
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice1
Environmental and Resource Economics1

Family tree#

Each paper sits under the earlier paper it builds on; papers that cite no other paper here start a branch of their own.

Papers linking to tm (R package), most cited first
PublishedTitleJournalAuthorsCitationsLink
2021-03-10Attitude of college students towards ethical issues of artificial intelligence in an international university in JapanAI & SocietyNader Ghotbi, Tung Manh Ho, Peter Andrew Mantello99cites it
2023-02-06Is it time for marketing to reappraise B2C relationship management? The emergence of a new loyalty paradigm through blockchain technologyJournal of Business ResearchHorst Treiblmaier, Elena Petrozhitskaya67cites it
2020-04-22Topic modeling and technology forecasting for assessing the commercial viability of healthcare innovationsTechnological Forecasting and Social ChangeS. Sinan Erzurumlu, Dessislava A. Pachamanova62cites it
2017-03-08Data properties and the performance of sentiment classification for electronic commerce applicationsInformation Systems FrontiersYoungseok Thomas Choi, Habin Lee53cites it
2023-03-17Crypto Tokens and Token SystemsInformation Systems FrontiersJan Schwiderowski, Asger Balle Pedersen, Roman Beck49cites it
2022-07-07Evaluating a Natural Language Processing Approach to Estimating KSA and Interest Job Analysis RatingsJournal of Business and PsychologyDan J. Putka, Frederick Louis Oswald, Richard N. Landers et al.42cites it
2018-12-29Research on long-term care insurance: status quo and directions for future researchThe Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and PracticeMartin Eling, Omid Ghavibazoo38cites it
2021-05-28Effective use of online review systems: Congruent managerial responses and firm competitive performanceInternational Journal of Hospitality ManagementBiagio Palese, Gabriele Piccoli, Tsz-Wai Lui27cites it
2022-02-22Decoding customer experiences in rail transport service: application of hybrid sentiment analysisPublic TransportDibya Nandan Mishra, Rajeev Kumar Panda21cites it
2018-07-27Identifying research topics in marketing science along the past decade: a content analysisScientometricsIgor Barahona, Daría Micaela Hernández, Héctor Hugo Pérez–Villarreal et al.18cites it
2018-07-08Why do ecologists search for co-authorships? Patterns of co-authorship networks in ecology (1977–2016)ScientometricsAnderson Matos Medina14cites it
2021-01-2026 years left behind: a historical and predictive analysis of electronic business researchElectronic Commerce ResearchTuğçe Ozansoy Çadırcı, Ayşegül Sağkaya Güngör11cites it
2017-03-28Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015Environmental and Resource EconomicsMaksym Polyakov, Morteza Chalak, Md Sayed Iftekhar et al.9cites it
2017-04-01Experimental evaluation of parameter settings in calculation of hybrid similarities: effects of first- and second-order similarity, edge cutting, and weighting factorsScientometricsFabian Meyer-Brötz, Edgar Schiebel, Leo Brecht9cites it
2021-01-12Technology Integration and Analysis Using Boosting and EnsembleJournal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexitySunghae Jun8cites it
2023-05-15Variational Bayes estimation of hierarchical Dirichlet-multinomial mixtures for text clusteringComputational StatisticsMassimo Bilancia, Michele Di Nanni, Fabio Manca et al.8cites it
2022-01-27What do analyses of city size distributions have in common?ScientometricsClémentine Cottineau7cites it
2022-01-16Trump’s COVID-19 tweets and Dr. Fauci’s emailsScientometricsDavid E. Allen, Michael McAleer6cites it
2019-10-05Ensemble quantile classifierComputational Statistics & Data AnalysisYuanhao Lai, Ian McLeod5cites it
2024-09-06Segmenting transit ridership: From crisis to opportunityTransportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeIgnacio Tiznado-Aitken, Matthew J. Palm, Steven Farber3cites it
2025-04-25Stochastic variational inference for clustering short text data with finite mixtures of Dirichlet-Multinomial distributionsStatistical PapersMassimo Bilancia, Andrea Nigri, Samuele Magro2cites it
2026-06-25What we talk about when we talk about science commercialization: a framing perspective from a German UniversityThe Journal of Technology TransferMia-Celine Zsohar, Andreas Wahl, Ferran Giones1cites it
2019-07-15Mónica Bécue-Bertaut (2019): Textual Data Science with RStatistical PapersJonas Rieger0cites it
2026-02-13From foundation funding to academic capitalism: Organizational strategies for interdisciplinary sustainabilityInternational Journal of Educational DevelopmentChan Aristella Lu, Jing Li0cites it

How this is measured#

Links are read from each paper's Crossref record as its publisher deposited it: the URLs and repository DOIs in its reference list (the software and data it cites) and its supplementary links (“is-supplemented-by”: its own code or data). A paper that gives its code only in the text, a footnote or a data availability statement is not counted, and some publishers deposit reference lists without their URLs, so every count here is a lower bound. Repository details come from the GitHub REST API (stars, forks, and the repository a fork was made from), the Hugging Face Hub API (likes, downloads, and the base model a model was derived from) and DataCite (Zenodo and other data DOIs, and the GitHub release a Zenodo record archives), read again every month.

Cite this page

Scholar4AI. (2026). tm (R package): papers linking to it. Journal and Conference Research Rankings. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://scholar4ai.com/code/cran-tm

@misc{scholar4ai-code-cran-tm,
  author = {{Scholar4AI}},
  title = {tm (R package): papers linking to it},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://scholar4ai.com/code/cran-tm}},
  urldate = {2026-11-03},
  note = {Journal and Conference Research Rankings; data from OpenAlex (CC0); licensed CC BY-NC 4.0}
}

Free to reuse for non-commercial purposes with attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0).