Scholar4AI Updated 2026-11-05 06:02 UTC+09:00

Open Graph Benchmark

Browse dataset profiles

data category: Graph learning benchmarks · 0 papers in the last 7 days

← Most-used data · All Graph learning benchmarks datasets

Citation, molecule and other graphs used to compare graph neural networks.

Share: X LinkedIn Bluesky Threads Facebook Reddit Hacker News Hatena LINE Email
Copy:

Names searched for: Open Graph Benchmark, ogbn-arxiv, ogbn-products, ogbg-molhiv

Tasks, access and usage conditions#

Mention counts below measure name matches in tracked papers, not benchmark quality or downloads. A family count can cover multiple datasets; it is not a separate count for each comparison row. Choose a task and version first, preserve evaluation splits, and follow the linked release terms. The site's content license does not replace the datasets' own terms.

Dataset comparison: tasks, access and usage conditions
Dataset / versionTask and evaluationAccess and preparationUsage conditions
OGB — task-specific releasesNode, link and whole-graph property prediction across distinct datasets.

Evaluation: Use the task’s official metric and split (which may be temporal or scaffold-based); an OGB score is not one universal metric.

Official source / documentation

Select a named dataset (for example ogbn-arxiv or ogbg-molhiv), use the supplied split and evaluator, and record the package/data version.

Check the license on each OGB dataset page; a single package license does not apply to every source graph.

Guide updated 2026-11-05.

Key findings#

  • From Nov 2023 to Oct 2026, 86 archived papers mentioned Open Graph Benchmark in their title, abstract, keywords or full text, most of them in Aug 2025 (7).
  • No paper of the tracked journals mentioned Open Graph Benchmark in the last 30 days (2026-10-07 to 2026-11-05).
  • From 2017 to 2026 (so far), Open Graph Benchmark was mentioned in 92 papers in the tracked journals, most of them in AI (91) and information systems (1).
  • 28 of them were published in 2025, against 0 in 2017.
  • Since 2023, the institutions with the most of these papers were Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (6), National University of Singapore (5) and Jingdong (China) (4).
  • The journals publishing most of them were IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (18), IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (17) and IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (10).
  • The most-cited of them is “Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey” (IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2024), with 155 citations.
  • Papers use Open Graph Benchmark most often with Cora / CiteSeer / PubMed (Planetoid) (25), Molecule benchmarks (QM9, ZINC, MUTAG) (25) and Reddit (21); it has 18 partners in the code and data network, in the group around Twitter / X, Facebook, YouTube / TikTok.

Mentions over 36 months#

Papers mentioning it by publication month, Nov 2023 to Oct 2026 (titles, abstracts, keywords and full texts)
TrendNov 23–Oct 24Nov 24–Oct 25Nov 25–Oct 2636 months
25293286

Papers per year#

2017: 0 papers2018: 0 papers2019: 0 papers2020: 0 papers2021: 0 papers2022: 1 paper2023: 6 papers2024: 29 papers2025: 28 papers2026 (so far): 28 papers
20172026 (so far)
Papers per publication year and category
Category2017201820192020202120222023202420252026 (so far)
AI0000016292827
Information Systems0000000001
All categories0000016292828

Where the papers come from#

Institutions with the most papers, since 2023
#InstitutionPapers
1Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications6
2National University of Singapore5
3Jingdong (China)4
4The University of Queensland4
5Athena Research and Innovation Center In Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies3
6China Telecom3
7Griffith University3
8Hong Kong Polytechnic University3
9Macquarie University3
10National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos"3
Countries with the most papers, since 2023
#CountryPapers
1China49
2United States18
3Australia14
4Singapore7
5United Kingdom6
6Hong Kong6
7Switzerland4
8India4
9Germany3
10Greece3
Keywords with the most papers, since 2023
#KeywordPapers
1graph neural networks55
2graph representation learning15
3node classification15
4large-scale graphs11
5over-smoothing11
6graph convolutional networks8
7graph condensation6
8graph transformer6
9large language models6
10link prediction6

Most-cited papers#

Archive counts by publication year: a paper counts when its title, abstract or keywords name the dataset, or when OpenAlex's full-text search finds it there (searched for the last 30 days' papers and, by a pass over the past years, for older ones). Names added to the list later are looked for in older papers as the archive is read again.

Used together with#

Papers use Open Graph Benchmark most often with Cora / CiteSeer / PubMed (Planetoid) (25), Molecule benchmarks (QM9, ZINC, MUTAG) (25) and Reddit (21); it has 18 partners in the code and data network, in the group around Twitter / X, Facebook, YouTube / TikTok. The whole network →

What papers use Open Graph Benchmark together with (at least 3 papers; lift 1 = chance)
Used withTypePapers using bothLift
Cora / CiteSeer / PubMed (Planetoid)Dataset25115.0
Molecule benchmarks (QM9, ZINC, MUTAG)Dataset25120.4
RedditDataset2118.1
WikipediaDataset147.2
IMDbDataset1226.6
FacebookDataset81.4
ImageNetDataset81.8
CIFAR-10 / CIFAR-100Dataset72.6
MNIST / Fashion-MNISTDataset62.8
Twitter / XDataset50.6
YelpDataset57.1
YouTube / TikTokDataset51.4
Cite this page

Scholar4AI. (2026). Open Graph Benchmark. Journal and Conference Research Rankings. Retrieved November 5, 2026, from https://scholar4ai.com/datasets/open-graph-benchmark

@misc{scholar4ai-datasets-open-graph-benchmark,
  author = {{Scholar4AI}},
  title = {Open Graph Benchmark},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://scholar4ai.com/datasets/open-graph-benchmark}},
  urldate = {2026-11-05},
  note = {Journal and Conference Research Rankings; data from OpenAlex (CC0); licensed CC BY-NC 4.0}
}

Free to reuse for non-commercial purposes with attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0).